Democracy has been a topic of great significance throughout history. However, Socrates’ unconventional views have criticized democracy from different perspectives and have led us to ponder the current state of this form of governance. Is it possible to evaluate the evolution of democracy and the likelihood of Socrates being right through his criticisms?
To understand why Socrates believed that those without a certain level of education should not vote, it is important to examine his critiques of democracy. Socrates explained the flaws of democracy by comparing it to a ship. According to him, when asked whom one would prefer to take charge of a ship during a voyage, people would choose those who have been trained in the rules and requirements of seamanship. Similarly, Socrates believed that the ability to vote is a skill that needs to be systematically taught to people. Voting should not be based on random intuitions but should require a certain rational thought process.
According to Socrates, allowing everyone to vote could be an irresponsible approach. He argues that the right to vote should be reserved only for those who can rationally engage with issues. Allowing those who have not acquired this ability to vote could be as irresponsible as appointing someone as the captain of a ship in stormy weather without proper training.
Socrates’ thoughts reflect his criticisms of the democratic system and the attitudes of voters during his time. In that era, democracy could be swayed by demagogues, and simplistic, populist rhetoric could be favored. Socrates believed that when elections focused on emotional manipulation rather than the qualifications and abilities of individuals, the functionality of democracy could be compromised.
However, Socrates’ thoughts do not provide a complete solution for how democracy should function. He simply emphasizes that the ability to vote requires a certain level of education and rational thought process. With this idea, the concept of intellectual democracy emerges, suggesting that a certain level of education is crucial for the qualified exercise of voting rights.
Looking at it from today’s perspective, debates and criticisms regarding democracy still persist. Evaluating the qualifications of elected leaders, their policies, and the outcomes of their decisions remain significant issues. Although the right to vote is typically tied to a certain age limit, factors such as education and level of awareness could be considered increasingly important.
In conclusion, Socrates’ belief that those without a certain level of education should not vote reflects his criticisms of how democracy functions. However, there are different opinions regarding the practical difficulties of fully implementing this belief and its compatibility with democratic values. Today, discussions continue on how democracy can function better and what needs to be done for voters to make more informed choices.
What are your thoughts on this topic? Share your ideas in the comments. See you in the next article.
This content has been translated from Moletik’s original content to English. It may not reflect the publishing policy of Moletik English.
Sources
https://www.theschooloflife.com/article/why-socrates-hated-democracy/
https://bigthink.com/politics-current-affairs/why-socrates-hated-democracy-and-what-we-can-do-about-it/